A Textual Analysis and Response to: In Memory of Zoe Yalland and Tortoise

Both numberss represent miserable in the ordinal century, albeit different types. Both atomic number 18 also pen in mindless verse. This allows the originator to write using a actually flexible servicemannequin non being hampered in the expression of thought or syntactical structure by the need to rhyme.The title In entrepot of Zo Yalland is stating clearly that this is a memorial to the lady however, this does not mean that it is an obituary. Although it is written afterwards her death I dont necessarily see it as an obituary, rather more of an epitaph, and a bitter one at that. Obituaries are generally very generous in their remembrance of the deceased. They usually notice their animateness and the contributions they made to it, paint a pretty picture of how love they were and how tragically missed theyll be. This poem is unaccompanied contrary to the norm as regard to obituaries. I see this written on a tomb, as if to say, Look Here lays a young woman, who durin g her life suffered a swell deal. Go live your life to the full, savour each moment, love those slightly you, for you know not what tomorrow brings.Tortoise is a different title altogether. It is written in the same context as the verse, ambiguously and metaphorically. Initially you deliberate that the verse is literally more or less a tortoise, until you come to realise that the reason is using a clever play on words. As you get hold of on you find yourself analysing the text, struggling to understand what the author is trying to say, which is totally contrary to In entrepot of Zo Yalland. While Zos poem is lawful talking and to the point, Tortoise is ambiguousZos poem is weighed down with mental and natural anguish, the torturing of mind and body. It represents the defends of every mean solar day life against society and disease. The text use is very harsh, no frills, the author has told it standardised it is. This is a poem that could be written for so many and yet I f eel that this is ain to the author. I gestate Zo was close to him and he is airing his anger and licking at the waste of such a young life. Zo was clearly a person who never found true happiness. It evokes pathos, I felt quite disturbed when I read this.Also you can read psychoanalysis July at the multiplexTortoise, I feel portrays the story of a soldiers miserable. This is the suffering of a tormented soul, the very suffering of ones spirit. Here is a man who has fought wars, seen comrades suffer and die, and is left but a shell of his former self. He has shut himself away from the world, for its grievances are nothing compared to what he has seen and experienced. He walks around like you or I and yet in his eyeball his ruction is clearly visible. Nothing is important to him anymore he wanders day to day, questioning nothing, existing, and drifting like a forgotten spirit. This poem is feature with bathos. It made me feel melancholy.Zos poem is quite angrily written. thit her are undertones of bitterness and regret, maybe these are emotions felt by the author for his subject. Words such as dog shit and nothing through with(p) show the harshness of the authors feelings towards her situation. His tone through fall out is blue and regretful, with a hint of unfairness he knew an awful lot about her life. It paints a very bleak picture of a young, hopeful, yet very sad life that never quite came up to her expectations. I believe the author is trying to say that we should all care a detailed more about those around us, to light our eyes and see the macrocosm of life, and to live each day as if it were our last. He is trying to bring the cruelty and unfairness of the world.At first glance the referee of the Tortoise could be totally baffled by the text in this one. It definitely requires raise scrutiny to try and understand what the author is trying to say. The text is much(prenominal) more gentle and simple, yet more difficult to understand repay able to the ambiguity. I believe only the author truly knows the meaning keister Tortoise, it is left up to the reader to interpret it in their own way. by chance this was the intention. While Zos poem is quite clear to understand Tortoise is open to many interpretations.The text in In Memory of Zoe Yalland is very negative. For character no space, no sun, nothing done, box in, dragged down and not true. There is also text, which indicates the struggle in her life such as battling, hoping luck could run out more like praying, that with time honest staying meant starting to belong. As you read the text in the first verse it draws you into the emotional turmoil that she is experiencing, you are able, quite easily, to relate to her suffering. In the second verse I felt the emotion the author was displaying. He was unmistakably hurting not only at the loss of this woman, but also at the brusque hand fate had cruelly dealt her. His words were cutting, as if to shock the reader int o recognising the reality of this awful situation.Read alsoCase 302 July in MultiplexThe text of Tortoise in comparison to Zo is quite positive, although in a sad way. So he became a sort of miraculous stone suggests that until now though he was struggling he overcame his problems and adjusted, even after he had everything shot away. Everything about the poem suggests a gentle gloaming to lifes difficulties. You see? is almost like saying, oh well phrases like no question either, no reason to hurry and life is simple, are all positive, but in the context of the poem its as if he has given up, and so, life is no chronic difficult. He cant change what has happened, so he just lives with it, inside his shell.In conclusion I found In Memory of Zo Yalland to be a very negative poem with harsh realities and no hope, while Tortoise was more positive and hopeful, although it still cleverly portrayed suffering using a clever use of language. While In Memory of Zo Yalland bore pathos, Tort oise contained bathos. These were two poems both displaying suffering but in entirely different ways.