The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison Essay -- Toni Morrisons The Bluest Ey

The blue-bloodedst essenceThere are many pieces that seem to run end-to-end this story. for each one theme and conflict seems to always involve the character of Pecola Breedlove. There is the theme of finding an identity. There is also the theme of Pecola as a dupe. Of all in all the characters in the story we can definitely sympathize with Pecola because of the many unc forbiddenh circumstances she has had to go through in her lifetime. Perhaps her rape was the virtually tragic and dramatic experience Pecola had experiences, but nonetheless she continued her life. She eliminates her adept of ugliness, which lingers in the beginning of the story, and when she sees that she has blue eyes now she throws her perspective on life. She believes that these eyes substantiate been given to her magically and in some respect her eyes begin to corrupt her as an individual. The story begins to take a turn and the reader realizes that the main character has begun to entirely rely on sel f-image in order to build confidence. This leads to the question of how significant are the Blue eyes to order of magnitude and how does the theme of smash and ugliness linger throughout the story. With this in mind, how does this make Pecola a victim of society and a victim in herself? If any mortal can be credited for creating the regression of beauty that Pecola builds it is Pauline (Pecolas mother). Pecola experiences many insecurities and it can definitely be said that many of these are because of the way that Pauline acts in society and around Pecola. It was stated in the story that Pauline would always go to the movies and rate the characters on their beauty. This is one example that shows the obsession that Pauline has with beauty and looks. This rubbed off on to her daughter and that is where Pecola received her lack of self-esteem. It is clear that Pecola idolizes the ideals of be beautiful. It is interesting that Pecola is not the person telling the story in this boo k, and it is Claudia instead. It seems that the cause wants the reader to build an immense amount of sympathy for Pecola because it would just be less effective if Pecola was telling the story. If it Pecola that was narrating in many parts thence it would be more difficult to see her as a add up victim. The structure and way this book is organized is a bully clue of how Morrison wants us to see Pecolas and all black peoples situations. quite of ord... ...could work miracles. This comes from the character Soaphead who finally realizes what it must be like to be an African American in a anti-Semite(a) society. If only Pecola could literally see life through the eyes of someone who is not loaded by their society. Pecola only wants to live up to the image of a blue-eyed(prenominal) white person. This is important, and it shows that the author is not only speaking to the black person about their sorrows, but also to the white person which shows how a racist social system can wear down an innocent mind. basically being white is being successful and Pecola has no hope in this society. It is not solely because of racism that Pecola is not accepted. Not only does she have to deal with the hatred she receives from the white person, but also she is an outcast in the black infrastructure. This proves that Pecola is a total victim because she has no way out and the only way she can be normal is to try to change who she is in order to be someone she is not. Basically Pecola is totally entrapped by everything, her past (rape etc..), her present (society both black and white) and her future (she has very half-size hope at being an contributing member of society).