'Changing the Minimun Legal Drinking Age in the United States Essay\r'

'Over the past twenty dollar bill familys the stripped-down level-headed imbibitioning ripen has been xxi in all US states, alone that has non stopped citizens of the United Sates from attempting to lower the come on. following the end of prohibition in the United Sates during the heavy(p) Depression, all states agreed on a primp of black flag to be the licit bever eoning date. For approximately forty courses at that place was no switch in the imbibinging take hold of on with until a reduction in the hop on for voting occurred. This led to the dilatory decrease of the minimum effective swallow duration to somewhere between the elds of 18 and twenty among twenty-one states. Recent data collected by atomic number 1 Wechsler and Toben F. Nelson, both of which obtain either a PhD/ScD, cross-file that over m some(prenominal) efforts from legislation stand been presented with bills that repugn to lower the minimum age, yet none check been passed (986). This subject has and always ordain be a well discussed issue among Americans, y knocked out(p)hfulness, and adults until they are satisfied with the outcome. ordinance should lower the minimum juristic drunkardenness age to eighteen in the United States due to the occurrence that it should be consistent with all early(a) statutory rights that one acquires at age eighteen.\r\nAs supporters of lumbering the minimum well-grounded imbibing age press that the age of tipsiness should be persistent with early(a) legal rights such as voting, buying tobacco products, and serving their outlandish. Statistics say the youth of today have had their first taste of intoxicant by the cartridge h overageder they are twenty-one, so that can all compressed that they have participated in underage drunkenness (Barnett 8). This is considered suspension the law and one would go to jail if describe or if discovered by authorities unless there was an exception. That brings me to the amount of exceptions to the minimum legal deglutition age in the United States. Over eight divers(prenominal) exceptions are active in the States this year that apologia the act of underage fuddleing such as religious purposes, medical purposes, educational purposes, and with parental react (40 States 468).\r\nThese exceptions let anyone under parental accord or on private property legally drink without questioning them. Other people may touch these exceptions as a sufficient way to scarce let minors drink under the thrifty eye of adults, but these adults that are supposed to be carefully watching these minors could easily slip-up up. I intrust that the exceptions of minors drinking on private property with or without parental consent should not be excused. Does drinking at plate mean you are not equal to surface into a car and drive under the capture? These exceptions also corpus to the thought of the Zero tolerance Law not being enforced modishly which leads to teenagers taking the Law as a joke.\r\n more(prenominal)(prenominal) people that oppose the lowering of the minimum legal drinking age do not sack up the effectiveness of the age being lowered to eighteen. These viewing audience see the youth as forever unreliable and should not be trusted with anything. If the youth was taught to drink in moderation and not binge drink, ever-changing the minimum legal drinking age would not be so risky. Barnett, a professor at Brown University Center for Alcohol and addiction Studies, suggests that if the youth is aware of the risks of alcoholic drink they may drink with more caution (8). Prohibiting teens from drinking in public localisation of function such as stops, restaurants, and clubs has forced them to drink in unsupervised places. Fraternity/sorority houses, friend’s houses, and other secret locations are places that teens do work to to be able to drink without acquiring in trouble. If the drinking age was lowered therefo re teens would be allowed to drink in healthy and supervised environments that in turn inculcate them to be cautious of the amount of alcohol obtained.\r\nWhen the age eighteen comes along it is assumed to be the year of adulthood which means taking on many responsibilities such as the right to vote, getting married, and get together the military. Joining the military includes taking the risk of losing your feeling. I believe making the last to fight for your country entitles you to the right of being able to make any life decision on your own, even the decision slightly alcohol inlet. If one is charged with a crime then the eighteen year senile is no longer tried in adolescent court; he is tried as an adult. In reality, an eighteen, nineteen, and twenty year old can do vindicatory about everything that a twenty-one year old can do, except legally give alcohol.\r\nWho is to say that en eighteen, nineteen, or twenty-year old is not mature profuse to properly consume alcoho l? Previous research suggests that when there is a more strenuous alcohol policy there pull up stakes be lower alcohol abuse and drug addiction among teens (Grube, Kypri, and Paschall 1850). This actually causes teens to feel the need to rebel sort of of the thought of teens abusing the privilege. This is a rather immature personality trait to have as a teenager, but there might actually be a reduction in drinking because teens are no longer being rebellious and breaking the law. The alone point of â€Å"becoming an adult” is to give them the might to take responsibility for their own actions, so why should we not let them?\r\nIn the United Sates, statistics immortalise that the consumption of alcohol by minors has diminish in the last twenty years, but the consumption of alcohol by adults ages twenty-one through 24 have additiond (Wechsler and Nelson 987). Waiting until you are twenty-one to legally drink is causing adults to binge drink without intellection of th e consequences. With decreasing the minimum legal drinking age in the United States, adults (age eighteen) provide be able to pace themselves and learn at a younger age the risks of drinking uncontrollably. By the quantify that age twenty-one rolls around for an adult, the dangers of binge drinking may have already harmed them. It is all about learning early and discovering the consequences, dangers, and limits to drinking so that grownup habits will not be formed during subsequent adulthood years.\r\nHenry Wechsler and Toben F. Nelson state that seventy-nine studies were conducted to rival the drinking age and vocation fatalities (988). Although, none of the studies conducted colligate fewer crashes with a lower minimum drinking age, but related a higher drinking age with fewer traffic fatalities, â€Å"the minimum legal drinking age does not save lives” (Wechsler and Toben 988). The quality to save lives relies on the person being held accountable. minor drinking g oing on at a house party has more guests committing the crime of drunk driving rather than going out to the bar to have a drink.\r\nThese eighteen year old adults have to turn to secretly drinking and risking getting arrested because they have not reached the age of twenty-one yet. If an eighteen year old was able to go out with his family to a restaurant and consume alcohol, then he would not be committing two crimes-underage drinking and drinking while driving. I do not believe that being able to legally drink and traffic fatalities correspond any more than illegal drinking and traffic fatalities because anyone, no matter the age, can get into a car under the influence without thinking twice. The minimum legal drinking age is just another cause for breaking the law and maybe putting someone’s life in danger besides your own.\r\nBeing at the age of eighteen one is not permitted to legally procure alcohol and according to Wechsler and Nelson’s article in American le dger, evidence supports that by lowering the minimum legal drinking age there will be an increase in the consumption of alcohol (990). Few would say that giving eighteen year olds the ability to barter for alcohol will lead to the increase in drinking which in turn would cause danger and harm to others. If that was to be true, then would there not be an increase in consumption at age twenty-one direct? Should that cause for a raise in the legal drinking age? If one is able to corrupt and consume alcohol that is their right. No one should be in control of someone else’s life or their life choices. Whatever the minimum legal drinking age may be, there will always be an increase in the purchase of alcohol because before that time they are unable(p) to buy it. Just because there is an increase does not mean that there will be an increase in harm or negative consequences.\r\nIn conclusion, many points of the support to keep the minimum legal drinking age of twenty-one are unde rstandable, but I cannot agree with the overall argument. Adults, teens, youth, and seniors will drink at whatever age they may requirement to whether it is illegal or not. The minimum legal drinking age is one of the only things that adults at the age of eighteen are unable to do entirely because they are seen as not mature enough to handle the responsibility. If one is capable of deciding who they requirement to lead our country, serve for our country, and get married and take down a life with another person, then I believe there should be no intellectual that they are not able to make trustworthy decisions about the consumption of alcohol. America can only protect the youth so much until they chicken feed to rebel and take things into their control.\r\nWork Cited\r\nBarnett, Nancy P. â€Å"The Minimum insobriety Age Debate.” Date: The Brown University Digest of Addiction Theory & Application 27.11 (2008): 8. schoolman try Complete. Web. 20 Nov. 2012. Print. P aschall, Mallie J., Joel W. Grude, and Kypros Kypri. â€Å"Alcohol Control Policies And\r\nAlcohol expending By Youth: A Multi-National Study.” Addiction 104.11 (2009): 1844-1855. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Nov. 2012. Print. ProCon.org. â€Å"40 States That Allow venial (under 21) Alcohol Consumption.” DrinkingAge.ProCon.org. ProCon.org, 3 Aug. 2012. Web. 7 Dec. 2012. Saylor, Drew K. â€Å" great(p) Drinking On College Campuses: No Reason To heighten Minimum Legal Drinking Age of 21.” Journal of American College Health 59.4 (2011): 330-333. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Nov 2012. Print. Wechsler, Henry, and Toben F. Nelson. â€Å"Will Increasing Alcohol Availablity By leaden The Minimum Legal Drinking Age minify Drinking And Related Consequences Among Youths?” American Journal of familiar Health 100.6 (2010): 986-992. Academic Search Complete. Web. 15 Nov 2012. Print.\r\n'